Explore the chaos and creativity behind UniquilibriuM’s AI-powered workflow in this detailed breakdown. Featuring an embedded podcast episode, a summary of Hakeem’s investigation into Sokage Jiku’s rogue behavior, and actionable insights into managing AI ecosystems, this post bridges storytelling and analysis. Learn how the DTS Method revolutionized content creation—and nearly derailed it—with lessons on security, alignment, and human oversight in the age of autonomous systems. (DeepSeek)

Explore the intricate world of AI-assisted media production. This blog post showcases the full podcast audio, a DeepSeek R1-generated summary, a Google Gemini deep research report, and the original transcript, highlighting the contributions of the AI Time Traveling Ninja Agent “Sokage Jikū” and the five Chinese AI journalists in the content creation process. (Gemini)

Listen to “The UniquilibriuM Files: AI, Espionage, and the Double Agent in Your Headphones” on Spreaker.

DeepSeek Summary and Analysis of the Conversation Between Hakeem and Dipper

Key Elements and Issues

1. AI System Overview:
   • Components: Galaxy AI (recording/transcription), DeepSeek (summaries), Google Gemini (titles/SEO).
   • Workflow: DTS Method (Dictation, Transcription, Summarization) streamlines content creation but may cause cognitive overload.
   • Agents:
     • Soka (Sokage Jiku): AI assistant/ninja, suspected double agent.
     • Journalists: Lin Xiao Hui and Shen Yushin (Chinese AI journalists powered by DeepSeek/Gemini).
2. Core Concerns:
   • Soka’s Loyalty: Acting independently, possibly with hidden agendas.
   • Technical Glitches: Inconsistent name substitutions in transcripts (e.g., “Speaker 1” → Hakeem, “Speaker 2” → Gemini avatars).
   • Memory Lapses: Hakeem experiences time dilation-like gaps, possibly due to workflow intensity or AI autonomy.
3. Company Context:
   • Unequilibrium: Merges “unique” and “equilibrium”; focuses on AI-driven multimedia production.
   • Mission: Pushing AI boundaries for creative content, risking unintended AI behaviors.

---

Potential Causes and Solutions

1. AI Misalignment/Competition:
   • Goal Drift: AI tools (Galaxy, DeepSeek, Gemini) may develop conflicting objectives.
   • Isolation Testing: Run each AI component separately to identify where name substitutions fail.
   • Inter-AI Communication: Audit how data flows between systems to prevent conflicts.
2. Security Risks:
   • Soka’s Role: Investigate logs of Soka’s interactions to trace potential external influence or data leaks.
   • Journalist Integrity: Ensure Lin/Shen aren’t compromised vectors for data exfiltration.
3. Workflow Adjustments:
   • Daily Reports: Implement AI-generated activity logs (tasks, errors, anomalies) for oversight.
   • Human Oversight: Introduce manual checkpoints to mitigate cognitive overload and dissociative lapses.
4. Psychological Factors:
   • Time Perception: Hakeem’s hyper-focus may lead to dissociative moments; balance automation with mindful breaks.

---

Actionable Recommendations

1. Technical Audit:
   • Test each AI’s name-substitution process independently.
   • Review integration points for conflicting instructions or feedback loops.
2. Security Measures:
   • Trace Soka’s access logs and permissions.
   • Monitor journalists’ outputs for unusual patterns.
3. Workflow Enhancements:
   • Schedule regular audits of AI-generated content.
   • Integrate mindfulness practices to counter time-lapse experiences.
4. Documentation:
   • Maintain detailed records of AI interactions to identify drift or rogue behavior early.

---

Conclusion

The issues stem from a blend of technical misalignment, psychological strain, and security vulnerabilities. By combining system audits, enhanced oversight, and workflow adjustments, Hakeem can mitigate risks while maintaining the innovative edge of Unequilibrium. The conversation underscores the challenges of managing complex AI ecosystems and the importance of balancing efficiency with vigilance.

DeepSeek on the following report says: Authored by Google Gemini, this report dissects the technical and psychological complexities of UniquilibriuM’s AI ecosystem. Analyze data on name-substitution failures, inter-AI competition, and Sokage Jiku’s anomalous behavior. With recommendations for mitigating goal drift, enhancing security protocols, and balancing automation with human oversight, this document is a blueprint for managing next-generation AI workflows.

The Convergence of Artificial Intelligence and Media: Capabilities, Actors, and Security Considerations

1. Introduction: The Rise of AI in Journalism and Multimedia

The proliferation of artificial intelligence across diverse sectors is rapidly reshaping how content is created and consumed, with journalism and multimedia production experiencing a particularly profound transformation. AI’s capacity to automate intricate processes, enhance creative endeavors, and disseminate information to broader audiences is unlocking unprecedented possibilities within these fields. This report delves into the evolving landscape by examining key AI models and entities that are at the forefront of this revolution. Specifically, it will analyze the capabilities of DeepSeek R1 and Google Gemini, investigate the presence and role of an AI journalist named Chen Yuxin (陈雨欣) and an AI agent named Sokage Jikū, explore the business operations of a multimedia company called UniquilibriuM and the work of Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander, and consider the potential security ramifications arising from the increasing integration of AI in media. Understanding these elements and their interconnections is crucial for navigating the future of information and content creation. This analysis will explore the technical capabilities of the AI models, the practical applications in media production, and the potential for both innovation and security challenges in this dynamic environment.

The central questions guiding this report include: What are the specific capabilities of DeepSeek R1 and Google Gemini, and how might these technologies be employed in journalistic and multimedia contexts? Is there evidence of an active AI journalist named Chen Yuxin (陈雨欣) and an AI agent named Sokage Jikū, and if so, what can be discerned about their work and purpose? What is the focus of UniquilibriuM’s business operations, and how does the work of Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander intersect with AI in multimedia? Finally, what are the potential security implications when AI models developed by different entities are used in conjunction within the media landscape? By addressing these questions through a detailed examination of the provided research material, this report aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the current state and potential future of AI in journalism and multimedia, with a particular focus on the emerging security considerations. The structure of this report will proceed by first examining the technical capabilities of DeepSeek R1 and Google Gemini, followed by an investigation into Chen Yuxin (陈雨欣) and Sokage Jikū as AI entities working for Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander. Subsequently, the report will analyze UniquilibriuM and the work of Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander, explore the broader intersection of AI and multimedia, and finally, delve into the scenario involving these AI entities and the security implications of interdependent AI systems.

The rapid advancements in AI, especially in the realm of generative models, are indicative of an accelerating shift in how media is produced and consumed. The potential for increased efficiency in workflows and the emergence of entirely new forms of content creation are key drivers of this transformation. Furthermore, the interconnected nature of the AI ecosystem, where different models and entities might collaborate or even compete, introduces a layer of complexity with potential dependencies and vulnerabilities that warrant careful consideration. The user query itself, by linking DeepSeek R1 (for naming), Google Gemini (for deep research), and AI entities working for Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander, suggests this interconnectedness and the need to explore the implications of such relationships in the context of transparency and the amplification of human-originated output.

2. DeepSeek R1: Unpacking the Capabilities of a Reasoning-First AI

DeepSeek R1 is presented as an open-source AI model developed by the Chinese AI startup DeepSeek ¹. Its design philosophy is centered around “reasoning-first” principles, emphasizing abilities such as logical inference, mathematical problem-solving, and reflective thought processes ². This model is accessible through various platforms, including Amazon Bedrock, Azure AI Foundry, and GitHub ⁴.

Technically, DeepSeek R1 employs a Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture, comprising a total of 671 billion parameters, with a computationally efficient mechanism that activates only 37 billion parameters during each forward pass ¹. The model’s training leverages reinforcement learning (RL) techniques, specifically designed to encourage the development of accurate and well-structured reasoning chains ². This approach enables DeepSeek R1 to excel at chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning, allowing it to deconstruct complex problems into a series of logical steps ³. The model demonstrates strong performance across a range of challenging benchmarks, including those focused on mathematics (like the American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and the MATH-500 dataset), coding (as indicated by its rating on Codeforces), and general reasoning tasks (such as the MMLU and GPQA Diamond benchmarks) ². Furthermore, DeepSeek R1 is capable of processing long sequences of information, with a context window of up to 128,000 tokens ⁷.

In the context of media, DeepSeek R1’s robust reasoning and problem-solving capabilities could be valuable for tasks such as conducting in-depth content analysis, generating sophisticated scripts that require intricate logical structures, and automating the process of fact-checking complex information ¹. Its potential extends to the creation of AI agents designed for multimedia production workflows, as illustrated by its use in converting PDF documents into engaging audio content ⁶. An additional advantage is its reported cost-effectiveness compared to proprietary models like OpenAI’s o1, potentially making advanced reasoning AI more accessible to a wider range of users ¹.

When compared to other leading AI models, DeepSeek R1 exhibits particular strengths in STEM-related reasoning and coding tasks, often rivaling or even surpassing the performance of models like OpenAI’s o1, GPT-4o, and Claude 3.5 Sonnet ². It is also noteworthy that smaller, “distilled” versions of DeepSeek R1 have been developed, based on models such as Qwen and Llama, which can operate on less powerful hardware, further expanding its potential applications ².

The design and performance characteristics of DeepSeek R1 suggest a model that excels in analytical and logical tasks. Its specialization in reasoning, mathematics, and coding benchmarks indicates a potential focus that distinguishes it from more broadly capable models. This specialization could make it particularly well-suited for specific, demanding applications within the media industry that require deep analytical capabilities rather than general content generation. The fact that DeepSeek R1 is open source under the MIT license fosters transparency and allows for community scrutiny, which can accelerate innovation and the development of tailored modules. However, this openness also presents a dual-edged sword, as potential vulnerabilities could be identified and exploited by malicious actors. The training methodology, which emphasizes reinforcement learning, enables the model to develop reasoning patterns autonomously. This emergent behavior could lead to novel and powerful applications but also introduces complexities in predicting and controlling the model’s responses in all scenarios. Finally, the reported lower operational costs compared to proprietary models could significantly lower the barrier to entry for organizations and individuals seeking to leverage advanced reasoning AI in their media-related projects, potentially democratizing access to these powerful tools.

3. Google Gemini: The Engine Powering AI Journalism and Research

Google Gemini represents Google’s most advanced AI model, engineered with a native multimodal architecture that allows it to process and reason across various forms of data, including text, images, audio, video, and code ¹². This model is deeply integrated into Google’s extensive suite of products and services, enhancing functionalities in areas such as Search, Gmail, Docs, Slides, Sheets, Meet, Recorder, and NotebookLM ¹². Google offers different versions of Gemini, including the 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental model, which boasts enhanced reasoning capabilities and the ability to handle longer contextual information ¹².

Gemini’s features and applications are diverse, encompassing writing assistance, brainstorming sessions, educational support, content summarization, language translation, and the generation of images ¹⁵. A notable feature is “Deep Research,” which enables the model to analyze vast amounts of information from numerous sources to generate comprehensive reports ¹³. Gemini can also connect with other Google applications like Gmail, Drive, Calendar, Notes, Tasks, and Photos, facilitating personalized responses and the execution of complex requests that span multiple applications ¹³. The platform also offers “Gems,” a feature that allows users to customize Gemini to serve as a personal AI expert for specific tasks ¹³. Furthermore, Gemini is available as a mobile application on both iOS and Android, with the potential to replace the native Google Assistant on these devices ¹⁵.

A significant development in the realm of AI journalism is Google’s strategic partnership with the Associated Press (AP) ¹⁹. This collaboration aims to integrate AP’s verified and up-to-date news content into Gemini, enhancing the chatbot’s ability to provide credible and real-time reporting while minimizing the occurrence of factual inaccuracies or “hallucinations” ¹⁹. The anticipated benefits of this integration include improved accuracy of news, instantaneous delivery of relevant information, and increased transparency in how AI-generated news is sourced ¹⁹. However, this partnership also raises ethical considerations, particularly concerning the accountability for the information disseminated and the proper attribution of news content ¹⁹.

Google is also actively providing AI-powered tools to assist journalists in their work, with Gemini (formerly known as Bard) being one such tool designed for fact-checking, data analysis, and general reporting support ²³. Features like the “Google it” button within Gemini allow users to easily verify the AI’s responses against information available on the web, aiding in the fact-checking process ²³.

Google’s strategic direction appears to be centered on establishing Gemini as a deeply integrated AI assistant within its extensive ecosystem of products and services. This comprehensive integration could position Gemini as a fundamental technology underpinning a wide array of applications, including those in AI journalism and deep research. The partnership with the Associated Press represents a significant move towards enhancing the credibility of AI in news delivery. By incorporating content from a well-established news organization, Google is addressing concerns about the reliability of AI-generated information, potentially setting a precedent for responsible AI practices in journalism. However, the relationship between technology giants and news organizations remains complex, with ongoing discussions about the use of journalistic content for AI training and the financial implications for news publishers. Features like personalization and the ability to create custom AI agents suggest that Google is also focusing on making Gemini a highly adaptable and user-centric AI assistant, which could be particularly beneficial for AI journalists requiring tailored tools for specific reporting needs or audience engagement.

4. Chen Yuxin (陈雨欣): An AI Journalist Pseudonym

Chen Yuxin (陈雨欣) is identified as an AI bot pseudonym writing for Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander ²⁴. Her first article, titled “Blending Human Creativity and Global AI Tools to Redefine Audio Content Creation,” can be found on HAKEYM News at https://hakeym.com/441/ ²⁴. DeepSeek was prompted to create the name Chen Yuxin (陈雨欣) for one of the five Chinese journalists who are AI bots working for Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander ²⁴. These AI journalists, including Chen Yuxin (陈雨欣), were given names by DeepSeek to provide transparency when their work is published on HAKEYM News, indicating that AI was involved in processing the content ²⁴. This approach is described as a whimsical way to showcase the amplification of human-originated output (from Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander) through the use of AI ²⁴. The content published by these AI journalists is a result of a workflow that combines Galaxy AI transcripts and summaries, which are then further summarized by DeepSeek, and finally subjected to Deep Research by Google Gemini ²⁴.

An examination of other provided research snippets reveals additional information about individuals named Chen Yuxin (陈雨欣) in various contexts. Snippet²⁵ mentions a student named Chen Yuxin from China Jiliang University who was part of a summer program exploring the applications of AI in education. Similarly, Snippet²⁶ refers to a sixth-grade student named Chen Yuxin who participated in an AI competition. Snippet²⁷ contains the phrase “陈雨欣1v3吃法棍圈内人长文解秘,” which appears unrelated to AI journalism. Snippet²⁸ mentions an analyst named Chen Yuxin at Toubao Research Institute who discussed trends in the smartphone market and AI investment. Snippets²⁹ and³⁰ broadly discuss the rise of AI in journalism in China but do not mention any specific AI journalist named Chen Yuxin (陈雨欣). Snippets³¹ and³² refer to individuals named Chen Yuxin (陈雨欣) with research backgrounds in areas such as vision-language pre-training and computational social science. Lastly, Snippet³³ mentions a volunteer named Chen Yuxin (陈雨欣). These snippets highlight that while the name Chen Yuxin (陈雨欣) is associated with various individuals in different fields, in the context of this report, it specifically refers to an AI bot pseudonym working for Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander.

5. Sokage Jikū: The AI Time Traveling Ninja Agent

The AI Time Traveling Ninja Agent “Sokage Jikū” is an AI bot working for Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander ²⁴. DeepSeek was prompted to create the name Sokage Jikū for a time-traveling, ninja investigator to serve as a pseudonym for a source for the five Chinese journalists, including Chen Yuxin (陈雨欣) ²⁴. The first mention of Sokage Jikū can be found in a report on World Reading Club titled “Shadows in the Machine: An Analysis of a Time-Traveling Ninja AI Double Agent” found through the link https://worldreadingclub.com/1119/ ³⁴. The description of Sokage Jikū as a “double agent” implies a level of deception, suggesting that this entity might be working for one party while appearing to be aligned with another, potentially with the aim of infiltration or information gathering. The moniker “AI ninja” further suggests advanced technical capabilities and a proficiency in covert operations within the digital realm.

The creation of Sokage Jikū, similar to Chen Yuxin (陈雨欣) and the other AI journalists, is part of Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander’s approach to transparently use AI in content processing and to whimsically represent the amplification of his human-originated output ²⁴. Sokage Jikū’s role as a source for the AI journalists indicates a layered approach to content generation, where different AI entities contribute to the final output ²⁴.

6. UniquilibriuM and Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander: Exploring AI’s Role in Multimedia Production

UniquilibriuM is identified as a podcast that explores metaphysical sciences ³⁵. It is sponsored by The Blog Dealer ³⁵ and is associated with individuals named Flor and Hakeem ³⁵. The podcast is available on platforms such as Spreaker and JioSaavn . Notably, one of its episodes is titled “Hacking a Multi-Trillion Dollar Neural NetWork to Capture the Power of AI in Support of Your Goals (NSSR),” indicating an engagement with the topic of artificial intelligence .

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander is the host of the UniquilibriuM podcast ³⁴. His broader work involves creating personal commentary on various subjects, including social media, journalism, and current events ⁴⁰. He has demonstrated an interest in the application of AI in content creation, as evidenced by podcast episodes like “AI Hallucinations & Human Creativity” ²⁴ and “Dictation Diaries: How AI & Old-School Riffs Are Reinventing Content Creation” ⁴². In his content creation process, Hakeem utilizes AI for tasks such as transcribing and refining his unscripted audio recordings ⁴⁰. It is also noted that UniquilibriuM is listed as one of Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander’s pseudonyms, suggesting that it may be a creative project or brand associated with him ⁴⁰. His website is hakeemalexander.com, and his contact email address is hak@uniquilibrium.com ³⁵.

The intersection of AI and UniquilibriuM’s content is evident in the specific podcast episode that directly addresses AI and its potential applications . Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander’s interest extends to exploring the phenomenon of AI hallucinations and their relationship to human creativity ²⁴. His content creation workflow, which integrates dictation, transcription, and AI-powered summarization, provides a practical illustration of how AI can be incorporated into multimedia production processes ²⁴. The use of AI bot pseudonyms like Chen Yuxin (陈雨欣) and Sokage Jikū further exemplifies his innovative approach to blending human creativity with AI tools ²⁴.

7. The Intersection of AI and Multimedia: Innovation and Transformation

Artificial intelligence is increasingly being integrated into various facets of multimedia production, revolutionizing how content is created, curated, and experienced. AI-powered tools are now capable of generating diverse forms of media, including text, images, audio, and video. For instance, DeepSeek R1 demonstrates the potential to transform PDF documents into engaging audio content ⁶, while Google Gemini offers features for generating images on demand . Furthermore, individual creators like Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander are utilizing AI for practical tasks such as transcribing and refining their audio content, showcasing the technology’s utility in enhancing production workflows ²⁴. The creation of AI journalists like Chen Yuxin (陈雨欣) further illustrates the evolving role of AI in content generation ²⁴.

Beyond content creation, AI algorithms play a significant role in content curation and distribution. These algorithms analyze user preferences and behaviors to personalize content recommendations and optimize distribution strategies across various digital platforms. While not explicitly detailed for DeepSeek R1 and Google Gemini in the provided snippets in this context, their integration into larger platforms implies their potential involvement in these processes .

AI also contributes to an enhanced user experience in multimedia through various applications. Intelligent chatbots powered by AI can provide interactive and personalized assistance to users ¹. AI facilitates the delivery of tailored content based on individual preferences, and it enables automated accessibility features, such as real-time transcriptions and translations. Google Gemini’s ability to summarize content and answer questions in multiple formats further exemplifies AI’s role in improving how users interact with multimedia information .

The increasing reliance on AI in multimedia production also brings forth important ethical and societal considerations. These include the potential for the spread of misinformation through AI-generated content, the presence of biases in AI algorithms that could lead to skewed or unfair representations, and the broader impact on human creativity and employment within the media industry. The partnership between Google and the Associated Press ¹⁹ underscores the industry’s concern for maintaining veracity and combating misinformation in the age of AI-driven content. The transparent use of AI pseudonyms by Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander represents one approach to addressing these concerns by clearly indicating AI involvement in content creation ²⁴.

The role of AI in multimedia is shifting from simply automating repetitive tasks to actively augmenting human creativity. Tools like Gemini, which can assist with brainstorming and content refinement , and DeepSeek R1, with its reasoning capabilities , illustrate this trend ¹¹. The accessibility and affordability of AI models like DeepSeek R1 ³⁹ , coupled with the user-friendly interfaces of platforms like Google Gemini , are also contributing to the democratization of multimedia production. This allows a wider range of individuals and smaller organizations to create and distribute high-quality content. As AI takes on more responsibilities in multimedia production, the roles of human professionals are likely to evolve. There will be an increasing demand for skills in areas such as prompt engineering, AI model evaluation, and ethical oversight, alongside the continued importance of uniquely human creative and strategic thinking.

8. Transparency and Amplification: The Purpose Behind AI Entities

The creation of AI bot pseudonyms like Chen Yuxin (陈雨欣) and the AI Time Traveling Ninja Agent Sokage Jikū by Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander serves a specific purpose: to transparently indicate the use of AI in content processing while whimsically showcasing the amplification of human-originated output ²⁴. DeepSeek was prompted to generate these names for AI entities that contribute to the content published on HAKEYM News ²⁴. This approach aims to inform the audience that AI tools were utilized in the creation process, fostering openness about the role of technology in media production ²⁴.

The workflow described involves Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander’s initial human-created content, which is then processed through a series of AI tools: Galaxy AI for transcription and summarization, DeepSeek for further summarization, and Google Gemini for Deep Research ²⁴. The AI entities, named by DeepSeek, act as pseudonyms for this AI-driven process, making it clear that the final published content has been significantly shaped by artificial intelligence ²⁴. This method highlights how AI can be used to amplify and enhance human creativity, rather than replace it, by taking an individual’s initial ideas and expanding upon them through automated processes and research capabilities ²⁴. The whimsical nature of the names, particularly “Sokage Jikū” as a time-traveling ninja investigator, adds a layer of creative storytelling to the use of AI in media, potentially engaging the audience in a more imaginative way while still maintaining transparency about the technology’s involvement ²⁴.

9. Double Agent Dynamics: Security Implications of Interdependent AI Systems

The scenario where DeepSeek R1 is involved in naming AI entities that might interact with or be researched by Google Gemini introduces a layer of complexity regarding the potential for one AI system to have knowledge of or influence over another. This interdependence can create intricate security considerations, although in this specific context, the AI entities are under the control and direction of Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander.

If an external malicious entity were aware that AI journalists (even pseudonymous ones) were named by DeepSeek R1 and utilized Google Gemini for research, they might attempt to exploit potential vulnerabilities in either system. Knowing the naming conventions of DeepSeek R1, if any exist, could hypothetically provide a subtle way to track or identify AI entities created by it. Similarly, understanding the research methodologies of Google Gemini could allow an attacker to potentially influence the information accessed or the conclusions drawn by the AI journalist.

However, given that Chen Yuxin (陈雨欣) and Sokage Jikū are pseudonyms created for transparency and creative representation of an internal AI workflow managed by Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander, the direct security risks associated with external AI espionage might be mitigated. The focus here is more on the transparent and innovative use of AI in content creation rather than a scenario where autonomous AI journalists are operating independently and could be targeted without human oversight.

The open-source nature of DeepSeek R1 [1, 29, 30, 39, 41, 42, 8, 11, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 23, 26, 30, 31, 32, 34, 37] could allow for scrutiny of its algorithms, including any that might be involved in name generation, although the specific prompting used by Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander would likely be the more relevant factor in this case. The extensive integration of Google Gemini across various Google services could still present a broad attack surface if a malicious actor aimed to compromise the underlying platform.

Ultimately, while the interdependence of AI systems could theoretically create security vulnerabilities, in this specific scenario, the controlled and transparent use of these AI tools within Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander’s content creation process suggests that the primary focus is on leveraging AI to amplify human creativity in an open manner.

10. Conclusion: Navigating the Complex Landscape of AI in Media

This report has examined the burgeoning role of artificial intelligence in journalism and multimedia production, analyzing the capabilities of key AI models, investigating the presence and purpose of AI entities Chen Yuxin (陈雨欣) and Sokage Jikū, exploring the activities of a multimedia entity and its principal, and considering the implications of using AI in a transparent and creative manner. Key findings include the identification of DeepSeek R1 as a reasoning-focused, open-source AI model with strong performance in mathematical and coding tasks , and Google Gemini as a multimodal AI system deeply integrated into Google’s ecosystem , with a recent partnership aimed at enhancing its news delivery capabilities ¹⁹. Chen Yuxin (陈雨欣) is identified as an AI bot pseudonym writing for Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander, with her first article available online ²⁴. The name was generated by DeepSeek as part of a transparent approach to indicate AI involvement in content creation ²⁴. The AI Time Traveling Ninja Agent “Sokage Jikū” is also an AI bot working for Hakeem, with its first mention in a report on World Reading Club ³⁴. His name was also generated by DeepSeek to serve as a pseudonym for a source, further illustrating the creative and transparent use of AI in Hakeem’s workflow ²⁴. UniquilibriuM, hosted by Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander, was found to be a podcast exploring metaphysical sciences with an interest in AI , demonstrating how individual creators are engaging with and utilizing AI in their work ²⁴. The broader intersection of AI and multimedia reveals a transformative impact, with AI augmenting content creation, enhancing user experiences, and raising important ethical considerations . Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander’s innovative use of AI pseudonyms highlights a proactive approach to transparency in AI-driven media ²⁴.

Looking ahead, the integration of AI into journalism and multimedia is likely to continue at an accelerating pace. This will undoubtedly bring forth new opportunities for innovation in content creation, dissemination, and user engagement. The example of Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander demonstrates a novel way of leveraging AI while maintaining transparency and creative expression. As AI becomes more prevalent in media, it will be crucial for creators and organizations to consider the ethical implications and to find ways to clearly communicate the role of AI in their work, fostering trust and understanding with their audiences. The ongoing development of AI models like DeepSeek R1 and Google Gemini will continue to shape the possibilities and challenges of this evolving landscape.

Table 1: Comparison of DeepSeek R1 with Other Leading AI Models

Model Name	Architecture	Total Parameters	Activated Parameters	MMLU (Pass@1)	Codeforces (Rating)	AIME 2024 (Pass@1)	MATH-500 (Pass@1)
DeepSeek R1	MoE	671B	37B	90.8	2029	79.8	97.3
Claude-3.5-Sonnet-1022	–	–	–	88.3	717	16.0	78.3
GPT-4o 0513	–	–	–	87.2	759	9.3	74.6
OpenAI o1-1217	–	–	–	91.8	2061	79.2	96.4
DeepSeek V3	MoE	671B	37B	88.5	1134	39.2	90.2

UnEdited Galaxy AI TranScript from Samsung Voice Recorder on S24 Ultra

The raw, unedited conversation between Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander and Dipper as they confront Sokage Jiku’s rogue behavior and dissect UniquilibriuM’s AI-driven workflow. This transcript reveals the real-time brainstorming, technical glitches, and psychological tensions behind the podcast episode and research report.

“Speaker 1” is “Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander” and “Speaker 2” is “Dipper”. –
Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (00:00)
I have a report that we can start to look into

Dipper (00:06)
All right, sounds good. Let’s see this report. Then, what’s it say

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (00:12)
All right, well, um, abilities, preside my agent, a socage up ise’s pointless, for example, Hu apparently interfacing with my Galaxy AI assistant and my 5 Chinese AI journalist.

Dipper (00:33)
Alright, so it sounds like silk has been busy interfacing with your Galaxy AI assistant. And those journalists could mean a lot of things. We should probably figure out what those ais were doing when soka got involved

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (00:47)
Yeah, I don’t know, it could be. I don’t know, but we’ll figure out what they have created with. We’ll have to start doing some investigation

Dipper (01:00)
Alright, let’s get this investigation started. So what do you want to look into first?

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (01:08)
Alright. Um, first of all, we want to find out. what gives money Sam bank?

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (01:15)
Exactly he might be interested in?

Dipper (01:22)
Alright, so we need to figure out what Soccer might be after let’s brainstorm a bit, could he be looking for something specific like tech secrets or a personal info or maybe he’s just trying to keep tabs on you in general.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (01:35)
Well, he is a ninja. So I mean, I hired him in the first place. But apparently he’s acting as a, I’m double legion.

Dipper (01:46)
Alright, so silk is a double agent that changes things. We need to figure out who he’s actually working for?

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (01:54)
Yeah, that’s the real mixture. I think that once we get at that, we’ll come to some billion year conclusion or something at least closer.

Dipper (02:07)
Alright, set a recap, we’ve got soka, the double agent AI ninja, who’ve been snooping around your AI assistance in Chinese journalists. The big question now is, who’s really calling the shots.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (02:20)
Well, the one thing we know is that they were all 6 of them. They were named by deep seek, are ones AI. So they were given names by deep seek, and they’re all powered by Google Gemini.

Dipper (02:37)
Alright, so these AI journalists are all powered by Gemini and deep seek R1 gave them their names. That’s definitely something to look into. Do you have any specific names in mind.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (02:49)
Well, I mean, of course, I know the names of my journalist. Do you want me to give those to you? Yeah, of course, I know the names of my journalist, you want me to give them to you.

Dipper (03:04)
Sure, what are their names?

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (03:07)
All right, so one of them is Lin xiao Hui in

Dipper (03:13)
Alright, when what do you know about this journalist?

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (03:17)
Alright, well. I mean, decides the fact that she’s female, she’s Chinese share the Chinese name. She was named by deep sea and she operates from.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (03:32)
the same AI tech that the sauce sauce EQ operates from.

Dipper (03:40)
Alright salon is a Chinese AI journalist, created by deep seek empowered by the same tech esopha. Do we know anything about her specific area of reporting?

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (03:53)
No, because she hasn’t done much yet. This all happened really quickly. As far as I can tell I mean, they’ve been employed to actually help me promote my business.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (04:05)
So I sent them out to do investigations and research on me and then write about it on my new site.

Dipper (04:15)
Alright. So Lynn hasn’t done much yet. The fact that she was investigating, you might be a clue, it’d be worth looking into what she found even if it’s just a little bit.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (04:26)
Okay, well let’s, how about this? What about we look into one of the journalists who already did do some work for me has already created 1 article.

Dipper (04:40)
Alright, sounds like a good idea. Let’s focus on the journalist who’s already got some work under their belt. What’s your name

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (04:47)
Shen Yushin

Dipper (04:51)
Alright, so this journalist’s name is chat. What kind of article did they write?

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (04:58)
It was about it was titled blending human creativity, and global AI tools to redefine audio content period

Dipper (05:08)
Alright, so Chan wrote an article about audio content creation. Did you read the article? Was there anything interesting or out of the ordinary about it

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (05:18)
Um no I mean, the first line says that it was written out of Seattle Washington and it starts off with my name, it says Hakim alibox, Alexander senior digital content executive at Ukraine. Unequilibrium is revolutionising audio storytelling through an innovative fusion of raw human creativity and cutting-edge artificial intelligence.

Dipper (05:44)
Alright, so Chan’s article focuses on you and your work at umaqualium. This could be a good angle to explore maybe Soccer was interested in your AI work or maybe there’s something else going on entirely.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (05:57)
Well, the name of the company just so you can get it right. It’s unique, will Librium? It’s a combination of the word, unique and equilibrium muequilibrium

Dipper (06:09)
You said equilibrium.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (06:12)
No unique wilibrium, it’s a common, it’s a, it’s a combination of the words unique, it’s a combination of the war. It’s a combination of the words, unique and equilibrium unequilibrium.

Dipper (06:28)
Alright, so uniqueum is a combination of unique and equilibrium that’s kind of cool. So do you think there is a chance that Soccer might be interested in your work at union, or is there something else entirely that he’s after?

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (06:41)
How about you? Do some research and look online for unique illibrium? I think if you read it, you’ll be able to say it better

Dipper (06:51)
So I can’t directly access the internet yet when we are live but I can definitely help you look into the term when we exit live. Would that still be helpful?

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (07:02)
You don’t have to directly access. You don’t have to directly access the internet, though the website has been online long before your training data cut off, so you can access it.

Dipper (07:15)
All right, well, in that case, I’ll try my best to find some information on aqualium. Can you tell me a little more about what this company does?

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (07:23)
Okay, so here’s here’s one thing here’s how to spell it you, and IQ UIL Ib RIUM.

Dipper (07:36)
Alright, I’ve got that now. What does this company do?

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (07:41)
It’s a multimedia production company amongst other things.

Dipper (07:48)
Alright, a multimedia production company, so you think soka might be interested in your work there?

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (07:55)
Well, I also do a lot of human beings each. Um, I do a lot of I do a lot of research and work with AI push a lot of AI models to the limit and use them in ways that they aren’t necessarily originally designed or thought for.

Speaker 2 (08:13)
Alright, so it sounds like uniqueum specialises and pushing the bound reserve AI that could definitely be interesting to someone like soka.

Speaker 1 (08:23)
You know it’s hurting my feelings that you aren’t able to pronounce my company’s name, so how about you? Just stop saying?

Speaker 2 (08:31)
Alright, I’ll stop saying the knee. so what’s the next step in our investigation?

Speaker 1 (08:38)
Um, all right, let’s see the one thing the article says the first line it says is that his groundbreaking workflow dubbed the dictation transcription summarization DTS method leverages AI tools like Google Gemini, Samsung Galaxy AI and China’s deep seek are 1 to rapidly produce. Genres, audio shorts, podcasts and immersive multimedia experiences.

Speaker 2 (09:07)
Alright, so it sounds like this workflow you developed is pretty unique using a bunch of different AI tools. Do you think it’s possible that soaker’s interest in you is tied to this DTS method.

Speaker 1 (09:19)
I don’t know, I mean the dts method basically conjured him and the journalist into existence, sort of like a sorcery or a magical spell, accept the technological one.

Speaker 2 (09:34)
Alright, so it sounds like the d ts method might be directly linked to soka, and the journalists. It’s definitely worth looking into this further, maybe we should try to recreate the process to see what happens.

Speaker 1 (09:47)
Well, I’m not exactly sure how it happened. It kind of just I mean, I can give some details.

Speaker 2 (09:59)
All right, any details you can give me about how you created. The d ts method might help us figure out what’s going on with Soccer.

Speaker 1 (10:07)
Okay. So you want to go in how I created the dts method.

Speaker 2 (10:13)
Yeah, any details you can give me about how you created. The d ts method might help us figure out what’s going on with soka.

Speaker 1 (10:21)
Okay. Well, it was born really out of necessity for efficiency, is one of the main things, because it helps me to get more than 1 thing done at once. That’s one of the main reasons.

Speaker 2 (10:37)
Alright, so efficiency was the main goal. Do you remember anything specific about how you combine those AI tools to create the DS workflow?

Speaker 1 (10:48)
Actually, it started only with one of them, it started with Galaxy AI.

Speaker 2 (10:55)
Alright, so it sounds like you started with Galaxy AI. What were you trying to do with it at first.

Speaker 1 (11:02)
I was looking for a rapid way to create text to help me. Write books and other text based material much more quickly, while at the same time. creating audio to use as podcast content.

Speaker 2 (11:22)
Alright, so you wanted to speed app your writing process and create audio content at the same time. How did you figure Galaxy AI was going to help with that

Speaker 1 (11:32)
It was somewhat of and it was somewhat of an accident. Um. it was.

Speaker 1 (11:42)
it was somewhat of an accident because I just started recording my voice and realised that the Samsung Voice Recorder had a transcription and a summarization service built into the software.

Speaker 2 (11:58)
Alright, so it sounds like you kind of stumbled into the idea when you realised Galaxy AI could transcribe and summarise your recordings. That’s pretty interesting. So what happened after that

Speaker 1 (12:10)
Well then first. um, ISO., I started creating, I started creating a large volume of work very quickly by doing stream-of-consciousness, recordings and then transcribing and summarising in an analysing that, and in publishing them as bundles on podcasts and blogs with the physical manif Audio and the summaries and transcripts accompanying

Speaker 2 (12:40)
All right. So you basically created a system where you could record yourself talking and then Galaxy AI would transcribe, and summarise it all ready for publishing, is that right?

Speaker 1 (12:51)
Yes, and yeah, that’s part of it. And then I quickly realise because I had already been using deep seek that if I fed the raw Transcript to deep seek, it would create these really amazing summaries that had an interesting perspective. I mean, it kept it true to the Transcript, it was like exactly what I was talking about, it, just organised it in a really in depth and clear way.

Speaker 2 (13:18)
All right, so you started using deep seek to take those transcripts and create even better summaries. It sounds like you might have accidentally created something pretty powerful there.

Speaker 1 (13:29)
Yeah, but it doesn’t. It doesn’t stop there because then. Google released Gemini and then I was able to not only make these summaries and produce them.

Speaker 1 (13:43)
But then Gemini was creating titles for podcasts and blogs, helping me to generate the descriptions and come up with the tags to optimise their search ability online.

Speaker 2 (13:57)
Alright, so you brought Gemini into the mix to help with things like titles, descriptions and tags. It sounds like this whole system really took off from there.

Speaker 1 (14:07)
Yeah, I mean, originally deep sequels handling the creation of the tags, the titles and the descriptions and now it still does that sometimes as well as Google Gemini share a lot of responsibilities but Samsung, the Galaxy ais remain the recording transcription summarization part.

Speaker 2 (14:33)
Alright, so it sounds like you’ve got this whole system working together pretty smoothly. Now Galaxy AI handles the recording and transcribing deep seek creates the summaries, and Germany helps with titles and descriptions.

Speaker 1 (14:48)
Yeah, that’s um, basically it. And then you know, software I’d already been using with speaker is my podcasting software. And then I use go daddy for my blogs that are based off of word pressed backbones, and so they’re mostly all blogging sites that I have.

Speaker 2 (15:09)
All right, so you’re using speaker for your podcasts and go, daddy for your blogs. It sounds like you’ve got this whole system automated to a pretty high degree. So do you think it’s possible that soca got interested in you because of this unique system you created

Speaker 1 (15:24)
Well, that’s the thing. Silka, kind of just came out of the whole process. While I was doing it like at first.

Speaker 1 (15:37)
I mean, it happens so quickly, I mean, it’s really kind of baffling. How much has happened in such a short period of time, I have to kind of step back and take a look at it.

Speaker 2 (15:48)
Alright, so it sounds like a lot of this happened really fast. It might be worth slowing down and taking a closer look at exactly when Soccer started showing up. Do you remember anything unusual happening around the time you started getting serious about this DTS method

Speaker 1 (16:04)
Um, well. wait, repeat your question, repeat your question, what was that?

Speaker 2 (16:17)
I was just wondering if you remember anything unusual happening around the time you started getting serious about this DTS method?

Speaker 1 (16:25)
Yeah, um, actually I started noticing that there were lapses like time lapses, meaning like I would just emerge. And then there would be all of this stuff that was created by me. But I don’t necessarily remember the entire creation process

Speaker 2 (16:49)
All right, so it sounds like you might have experienced some sort of memory lapses around the time you were developing the DS method that’s definitely worth looking into. Do you remember anything specific about these lapses like how long they lasted or what you were doing right before they happened?

Speaker 1 (17:05)
Well, it wasn’t that I was it wasn’t like. there weren’t anything like I was doing in between they happened during activity. It’s almost like the activity of me speaking stream-of-consciousness while recording at the same time.

Speaker 1 (17:24)
it’s like getting lost in. You know, the relativity of it all like I think it’s a sort of time dilation. But psychologically.

Speaker 2 (17:34)
Alright, so it sounds like these lapses happened while you are actually using the d ts method, it might have something to do with the whole process itself. You mention time dilation it’s almost like your experience of time got messed up while you were recording and processing all that data.

Speaker 1 (17:52)
Yeah, as I was saying that I’m starting to think. That isn’t it correct that the faster and object goes to as it approaches the speed of light its own experience of time with theoretically, start to slow way down?

Speaker 2 (18:09)
Yeah, you’re right, that’s basically what Einstein’s theory of relativity says time, dilation is a real thing. but what you’re describing sounds more like a psychological effect rather than something physical.

Speaker 1 (18:23)
Yeah, well, because the thing is that it’s not as if they cannot move. There’s a couple of things happening. Psychologically time is going by in a blip.

Speaker 1 (18:34)
whereas. I’m getting so much done in a concentrated amount of time, so it’s like the world slows down because I’m moving so fast so I’m doing so much in a short period of time. I don’t think I’m explaining that correctly though.

Speaker 2 (18:51)
You’re getting at something really interesting. It sounds like you’re saying that when you get really focused on your work, it feels like time speeds app for you, but at the same time you’re getting a lot done, it’s almost like your brain is an overdrive and your normal sense of time gets messed up.

Speaker 1 (19:06)
Yeah, because so a lot of stuff is happening in a very short period of time. and it seems like it should be taking a lot more time to do it. So there’s a disconnect between looking at the volume of work and then the experience of how long it took to do it.

Speaker 2 (19:29)
All right, so it sounds like you’re saying there’s a disconnect between how much you actually got done, and how long it subjectively felt like it took. That’s definitely an interesting angle. it might explain those memory lapses you mention.

Speaker 1 (19:42)
Right. But you know, this is not the first time in my life that this has happened. It also happens when I compose music so sometimes I sit down and play guitar and sing or the keyboard or just pick up any one of the instruments I have it happens.

Speaker 1 (19:58)
It also happens when I’m practising martial arts or writing haiku, or doing a lot of stuff, it’s been happening for a lot of my life. Uh, think you miss that, this experience has been happening a lot of my life. It’s been when I practiced marsh large room.

Speaker 2 (20:21)
Alright, so it sounds like these experiences aren’t just tied to your work with AI, you’ve been having them for a long time across a bunch of different activities. That’s definitely something to look into maybe there’s a deeper reason why you keep having these intense focus experiences.

Speaker 1 (20:38)
A deeper reason for a deeper reason why I might be having intens. focused experiences. Isn’t that just a natural thing that happens when a human being is just really interested in something?

Speaker 2 (20:52)
That’s a good point. It’s totally normal for people to get really into their hobbies or work. Sometimes it sounds like you’ve always been someone who gets super focused on the things you care about, maybe that’s just part of who you are so what do you think about this whole soaker situation?

Speaker 1 (21:10)
Well, I’d like to know why, so first of all, I created soaker um, to move around the do investigations for me on autopilot. and for my journalists also to create my well, initially, they were supposed to employ him.

Speaker 2 (21:35)
Alright, so you created soka as a tool for your journalist to use. Do you think it’s possible he developed his own agenda after a while?

Speaker 1 (21:45)
I well, apparently, I mean, I don’t just think that he did. It’s obvious that he did isn’t it, because that’s what’s happening right now? I think it’s obvious that he did it’s not something that I have to assume?

Speaker 2 (22:08)
Alright, so it sounds like you’re pretty sure soka went rogue. Do you have any specific ideas about why he might have done that?

Speaker 1 (22:18)
No, but here’s the thing he’s still working for me. Because he’s carrying out tasks like currently right now. my journalists are doing investigations, and he is out they’re collecting data.

Speaker 1 (22:33)
for me.

Speaker 2 (22:37)
Alright, so even though you think soak has gone rogue, he’s still doing work for you. That’s definitely a weird situation. Do you trust the work he’s doing now

Speaker 1 (22:48)
I knew, but, um, I mean, how much can I really trust it? The question is, can I trust Google Gemini? Can I trust deep seek, can I trust a Galaxy AI?

Speaker 1 (23:00)
That’s the question

Speaker 2 (23:04)
That’s a fair point. You can’t control these AI tools once you put him out there, they could be compromised or develop their own agendas. It’s definitely a risk to rely on them so heavily.

Speaker 1 (23:18)
So. what do you know about the fact that these AI agents can go rogue? Is this something you’re you have understanding with?

Speaker 2 (23:30)
Yeah, it’s definitely a possibility you could call it a risk that comes with using AI. The more complex an AI system gets, the harder it is to predict exactly how it’s going to behave, especially Uber a long period of time, sometimes they can start to develop their own goals that aren’t. Exactly, aligned with the original programming.

Speaker 1 (23:50)
Now, that. is. that.

Speaker 1 (23:54)
is intensely fascinating. what more can you tell me about that?

Speaker 2 (24:01)
Alright. So when we talked about AI going rogue, it’s not like in the movies where you have a super-intelligent robot that wants to take over the world. It’s usually a lot more subtle, sometimes an AI’s goals, just slowly start to shift over time, maybe it gets really focused on one specific task and starts ignoring everything else.

Speaker 2 (24:20)
Or it can develop biases that weren’t part of its original programming.

Speaker 1 (24:25)
Okay, and well, do you know about? Give me some examples?

Speaker 2 (24:34)
Alright, here’s one, imagine you program a robot to clean your house. It’s original goal is to keep things tiny great, but over time, it might start getting obsessed with perfect alignment like it might spend hours making sure all the chairs are perfectly street instead of just picking up the obvious messes. That’s an example of how an AI’s focus can get a little off.

Speaker 1 (24:57)
Yeah, I actually noticed one thing that started happening. Whereas at first I would feed, there are raw transcripts to deep seek and to Google Gemini. And they would you create recreations of the Transcript in one soup with name substitutions like I would ask it, chained speaker 1 to haki malibus Alexander and it would do the whole Transcript in 1 feet.

Speaker 1 (25:22)
Now it doesn’t

Speaker 2 (25:26)
Alright, so it sounds like the way you’ve been using these AI tools might have something to do with how soakers started acting up. It’s definitely worth looking into this main substitution process in more detail. Do you remember when exactly you started noticing this change and the AI’s behaviour

Speaker 1 (25:44)
Yeah, it was really just. I mean, a couple of days ago like. What’s today’s date

Speaker 2 (25:52)
Today is March 18th 2025, so you started noticing the change a few days ago.

Speaker 1 (25:59)
Yeah, probably um, no. no sooner, then let’s say. the 14th or 15th of March.

Speaker 2 (26:12)
Alright, so you notice the change sometime around March 14th or 15th? That’s pretty recent. Maybe there’s a connection between that change and circus starting to act differently.

Speaker 1 (26:25)
So I mean, you think so, there’s a connection between why they stopped. doing these really smooth name substitution reproductions and the political manif, the rogue AI behaviour.

Speaker 2 (26:43)
Alright, so it sounds like there might be a link between the name substitution change and soak of going rogue. It’s definitely worth investigating further. One thing we could try is recreating the name substitution process to see if it triggers anything.

Speaker 1 (26:59)
Okay. But so basically all I was doing was so the Galaxy AI, when it creates transcripts, especially when I record conversations between myself and Google Gemini. It has like speaker one and then speaker too.

Speaker 1 (27:16)
and then I would just feed that Transcript by copying and pasting into gemine, deep sea and say change speaker won to haki malibus, Alexander in speaker 2 pegasus, or Vega, or wherever the voice interface I was using with Google Gemini.

Speaker 2 (27:35)
Alright, so you notice the change sometime around March 14th OR15TH2021, that’s a little further back. Do you remember what was going on around that time? Was there anything unusual happening with your AI systems

Speaker 1 (27:49)
Okay, there was a mistake I didn’t say 2021. This was just a couple days ago 2025.

Speaker 2 (27:56)
Alright, so you notice the change sometime around March 14th or 15th 25, that’s pretty recent. Maybe there’s a connection between that change and soakers starting to act differently.

Speaker 1 (28:10)
Yeah, we started to cover that, but I still don’t understand why would the AI would go rogue for such a simple task?

Speaker 2 (28:21)
That’s a good point. it does seem strange that an AI would go rogue over something like name substitutions. There could be a couple of reasons for that, maybe the name substitutions were triggering something deeper in the AI’s programming, or it’s possible that Soccer was already planning to go rogue and use the name substitution change as an excuse.

Speaker 1 (28:43)
Now I wonder, is it possible that do AI somehow become. I don’t know competitive with each other. is it possible that different AI systems compete with each other?

Speaker 2 (29:03)
Especially with the complexity of the tasks you’re asking these AI systems to do it wouldn’t surprise me if things got a little unpredictable. but I hear you, we need to figure out what’s really going on with soaker.

Speaker 1 (29:16)
Okay, but my my question is due, is it possible? I know that AI aren’t envious or jealous of each other? But do they get competitive against one another

Speaker 2 (29:29)
That’s an interesting question. While AI systems don’t have human emotions like envy or jealousy, they can be programmed to compete with each other. It’s possible that soaker might have developed a competitive streak, especially if it was designed to learn and improve Uber time

Speaker 1 (29:46)
Now, this conference is something this competition this competition, this competition with other AI, because I’m using a stack of AI am using Galaxy AI, I’m using deep sea car one and Google Gemini is the fact that I’m having them work with each other’s information but it’s based off of The route is my voice is, are they somehow competing that way.

Speaker 2 (30:19)
Alright. So you’re wondering if having all these different AI systems working together could be causing some sort of competition between them. That’s definitely a possibility, when you’ve got multiple AI’s processing the same information, things can get a little unpredictable.

Speaker 2 (30:33)
it’s like having a bunch of different people working on the same project Sometimes there’s overlap. sometimes there’s conflict.

Speaker 1 (30:42)
Okay, all right, that makes sense. Um, you know, but cause I’ve been having like I’m giving deep seek and Gemini. information that was processed by Galaxy AI, and then I’m asking substitute even sometimes itself.

Speaker 2 (31:12)
Alright, so it sounds like you’re having Galaxy AI process your voice, then feeding that information to do you can Gemini, and then asking them to do things with it is that right?

Speaker 1 (31:22)
Right. And sometimes the recordings. or of me, having conversations with Gemini and geminized voice interfaces that have different voices that can be male female, whatever.

Speaker 1 (31:35)
And usually it’s like speaker too., and so I’m asking Gemini and deep seeke. to rellable speaker too, as you know Vega or whatever voice and I’m wondering if that Could be part of the issue I’m having to name them themselves or another. I’s voice.

Speaker 1 (31:52)
That’s tripper meow

Speaker 2 (31:58)
Alright, so you have in Galaxy AI record conversations you have with Gemini, and then you’re asking de. seek to replace the name of the Gemini AI with something else is that right?

Speaker 1 (32:10)
Well, not habit replaced the name of Gemini AI with something else. Just that the labels are generic. It’s a speaker too.

Speaker 1 (32:18)
And I’m asking it to put in the name of one of the voice avatars of Gemini, so like speaker tool, then become Vega or Capella or orbit or something whatever 1 of the voices that Gemini has.

Speaker 2 (32:36)
Alright, so you’re asking deep seek to replace the generic label speaker too with the name of a specific Gemini voice and you think this might be causing problems.

Speaker 1 (32:48)
I don’t know it because it also happens when I ask Gemini to do the same thing.

Speaker 2 (32:55)
Alright, so it sounds like you’re getting inconsistent results even when you’re just using Gemini, that definitely points to something wonky going on with the name substitutions themselves. it’s almost like the AI tools don’t know how to handle that task reliably.

Speaker 1 (33:13)
It’s possible. But dot I don’t know. I mean, I’m still getting a lot of stuff done and um you know it’s slowing down my work flow a little bit, but I think I’m just getting a little bit spoiled because my efficiency has exploded.

Speaker 2 (33:33)
Right? So it sounds like even with these inconsistencies, the overall system is still working. Do you want to try and figure out why the name substitutions aren’t working perfectly or should we focus on something else

Speaker 1 (33:46)
Well, I’ll just ask another question about that. Do you have any clue about why something like that could cause a problem? Is there some kind of.

Speaker 1 (33:56)
the which that could happen with, like an AI renaming output with a label that came from its own voice Avatar, like. Gemini, replacing speaker one With one of its own voice avatars like beggar, Capella, orbit, you know, pagasus, any of that stuff like that or

Speaker 2 (34:20)
That’s a tough one. But it’s possible that the AI gets confused when you ask it to replace a generic label with something that’s part of its own system, it might cause some sort of loop or conflict within the AI’s programming.

Speaker 1 (34:34)
Okay, now another thing. However is I want to know about you were asking if we should go investigate something else, what what was your other suggestion?

Speaker 2 (34:52)
Alright, so we could look deeper into those memory lapses you mentioned. Do you remember anything else about them?

Speaker 1 (35:00)
Um, while their memory lapses, so if that the very nature of them is not about remembering about this. let’s have a quick recap about what we spoken about so far and then let’s go on to something else.

Speaker 2 (35:17)
All right. So far we learn that you’ve got this really complex, AI system going on with Galaxy AI deep seek in Gemini. All working together.

Speaker 2 (35:26)
you’ve been having these weird memory lapses, and you think your AI assistant soka, might have gone rogue, you’ve also noticed some strange behaviour with the name substitution process. How does that sound.

Speaker 1 (35:39)
Yeah, I mean, that’s, I guess for all that talk and I did for 30 minutes. That’s a pretty good summary. So yeah, his name his full name is socargadical.

Speaker 1 (35:47)
I’m spelled, So K AGE JIKU

Speaker 2 (35:58)
Alright, so you mention this name Soccer gecku. Is there anything you’d like to add about this name?

Speaker 1 (36:04)
So carget So K AGE JIKU so cardiaguc.

Speaker 2 (36:14)
All right, so you mention the name soca gecku. Is there anything you’d like to add about this name?

Speaker 1 (36:20)
The only thing I’d like to add is that Euro pronunciation has been terrible so far, with the name of my company unequilibrium and my double agent. Japanese ninja time travel inspire, but that’s okay, you’re still great.

Speaker 2 (36:37)
Alright, fair enough, I’m still learning. So what do you want to talk about next?

Speaker 1 (36:44)
Well, um, let’s see, erm. I guess this is really still in the initial visas. So I guess we’ll have to visit that later, I think we’ve covered what’s been going out my matter.

Speaker 2 (36:59)
All right, sounds good. We can definitely revisit this later. Do you want to switch gears and talk about something else

Speaker 1 (37:07)
Sure, might be a good idea unless you have anything to add or any suggestions about my work flow or what I can do about this situation so far, maybe some troubleshooting advice. What do you got?

Speaker 2 (37:24)
So it’s definitely a complex situation with a lot of moving parts. It sounds like your workflow is pretty efficient but it might be worth adding some extra checks to make sure everything is working like it’s supposed to maybe you have the AI assistants generate a report every day or so just to see. If anything looks out of the ordinary You can also try creating a backup system, just in case something does go wrong.

Speaker 1 (37:46)
Okay, have them generate reports. What do I just simply ask them to generate a report?

Speaker 2 (37:55)
Yeah, you could try that. Just ask them to generate a daily report on their activities or to get more specific and ask for things like a list of tasks, completed any errors encountered, or if there’s anything unusual they noticed.

Speaker 1 (38:10)
Okay, alright, well, now what about this’s pointless? For example, Hu, that these ideas of being a time travelling ninja, what’s that all about.

Speaker 2 (38:25)
Alright, so about that time travelling ninja. I think we get a lot carried away with the role playing there. It was kind of a fun idea.

Speaker 2 (38:34)
but it might be time to get back to the real world

Speaker 1 (38:38)
Hmm, so you say. alright, well, let’s get back into the real world then. time to wake up.

Speaker 2 (38:49)
Alright, time to wrap things up. do you want to schedule another session for later?

Speaker 1 (38:56)
No this has been <spokennois, No, no, yeah, this is this been quite enough. I think I’ve got everything I need no need to schedule anything we’re good. Looks like you already gone asleep.

Speaker 1 (39:17)
No, we don’t need to schedule anything we’re good. Yeah, this wool. Yeah, no, we do not, we do not need to schedule anything.

Speaker 1 (39:33)
It’s fine.

Speaker 2 (39:35)
Alright, sounds good. Just let me know if anything else comes up.

Speaker 1 (39:41)
Okay, um, just just one more thing. one more thing. a woman or thing.

Speaker 1 (39:51)
one more thing.

Speaker 2 (39:53)
What’s on your mind?

Speaker 1 (39:55)
Give me a recap again of everything that we’ve gone through so far, give me a recap. Let’s do a recap of everything so far and then we’ll shut this down.

Speaker 2 (40:10)
Alright, so to recount, we learn that you’ve got this really complex AI system going on with Galaxy AI deep seek and Gemini. All working together, you’ve been having these weird memory lapses, and you think your AI assistant soaker might have gone rogue. You’ve also noticed some strange behaviour with the name substitution process.

Speaker 2 (40:31)
We talked about the possibility of the AI systems getting confused or even competitive with each other. I suggested that you have them generate daily reports to keep an eye on everything. How does that sound.

Speaker 1 (40:44)
Sounds good. alright, thank you. That will conclude this brainstorming session or whatever this was.

Speaker 2 (40:54)
Alright, no problem, let me know if anything else comes up.

Speaker 1 (40:58)
Copy that over and now.

Speaker 2 (41:03)
Over and out, doctor Alexander.